Display analyst firm DSCC posted an interested article stating that the latest range of bezel-less LCDs are very similar to the high-end flexible OLEDs in form (not in contrast or image quality), to the point that mid-smartphone makers find it hard to justify the extra cost of a flexible OLEDs. The following table graphs shows the current price gap between flexible OLEDs and LCDs:
Price of a smartphone flexible OLED vs rigid-OLED vs LCD (DSCC, Feb 2018)While a flexible OLED does enable a higher display-to-body ratio (82.9% on the iPhone X, for example), a high end LCD comes pretty close - the Oppo F5 reaches 78.1%.

DSCC shows SDC's current fab utilization rates, and you can see how its flexible OLED lines dropped from almost 100% utilization at the end of 2018 to around 45% today. Samsung's rigid OLED production also dropped from around 80% in September 2017 to 50% today.

SDC OLED fab utilization rates (2017 - Feb 2018, DSCC)

DSCC estimates that Samsung is facing a difficult challenge, as its flexible OLED sales are dependent on high-end modules, and is very dependent on Apple. It is not likely that flexible OLEDs will be adopted by smartphones that are not high-end flagships. DSCC sees the situation resolved in the second half of 2018, as Samsung is expected to lower the prices of its flexible OLEDs and achieve more design wins.

Kyulux - Hyperfluoresence OLED emittersKyulux - Hyperfluoresence OLED emitters