Will OLEDs compete with LCD/PDP TVs?


Our friend at the DisplayBlog, Jin, has written an interesting view on OLEDs. Basically he says that by the time OLEDs are available (around 2010, hopefully) LCD/PDP TVs might have better contrast, be just as thin and with the same color gamut - and obviously they will be cheaper when OLEDs first arrive. In fact he thinks that a 30" OLED will cost about as much as a 60" LCD - and he's probably right at that - I'm not sure however that everyone will want such huge TVs!

My take is a bit different. First of all, I believe that OLEDs will improve at a faster rate than LCD/PDP. It's true that much more money is invested in the older, more proven techs, but being a new technology OLEDs can enjoy a much faster rate of improvement (it's always like that with new tech).

Second, I believe that because OLEDs are inherently simpler, and do not require a back light, they will always enjoy a better contrast ratio (blacks will only be real blacks when you do not use a backlight) and they will be smaller too. Actually being so much more simple means that OLEDs will eventfully be cheaper to make than other types of TVs. Another thing that Jin forgot to mention is refresh rate where OLEDs fare a lot better than LCD/PDP in this regard!

 

In fact, let me say this - LCD and PDP TVs simply do not look good. I have seen several new models, and on all of them the picture is always 'smeared'. My old CRT (yeah...) has a picture quality that is better! So while the new TVs are flat and thin and big and shiny - I personally think we have lost something in the picture quality.

 

My last argument is that OLEDs are also more power efficient - I think this is an important point. As we move towards a more environmental-oriented way of life, I believe this will be a major factor.

 

So what do you think? I'll be happy to get some reader's comments about this discussion!

 

 

Posted: Oct 21,2008 by Ron Mertens

Comments

You forgot to mention that OLEDs can be made flexible, and even transparent. How about a rollable TV screen? Just roll it up when you do not watch TV! Also the viewing angle on OLEDs is great too! (not sure how it is on new LCD/PDP?)

Dave,

It's true that it's possible to make them flexible, and transparent too.

But I don't think that we'll see such TVs in 2010! It will take several more years, I think!

Ron

These are all good scientific points, but the thing that will tip industry is cold, hard cash. When solution processing becomes feasible, you can see that the costs to produce an PLED screen will fall below that of an LCD while the screens will still command a price premium over LCD. Therefore the makers will earn more per screen which will make them and their shareholders happy.
I agree with you that OLED will have more to offer than LCD and PDP. I think youtr friend "Jin" is a businessman and a cheap business man only with short version. Besides contrast, brightness, thin, light weight, these I believe are technically acheivable by all these technologies by one way or another, by the time, we will look for features beyond these typical spefications, including power efficiency, portable, life-style, real color, health effect on the viewers, environemnt impact when we dispose them. Your friend shall know, LCD is not giving anu color, but to filter out light, eat energy produced by backlight. The irradiation of plasma and color distoration of PDP on his eyes are uncertain, and on his kid's eyes are even beyond his knowledge.
Let's keep this professional, shall we? Companies that manufacture LCDs and PDPs have been improving power efficiencies for many years. LCDs are found in many applications including mobile phones, notebook PCs, LCD monitors and LCD TVs.

Portability: The mobile phone platform requires the LCD to be extremely power efficient. Roughly 99.9% of all mobile phones incorporate LCD technology and there is a reason for it: performance and cost. The brutal reality is that cost is a big factor in making any business decision. It is not the only factor but is a very important one.

Real color: RGB LED backlights applications that incorporate LCDs are generating much better color (100% NTSC or more) than before. Before it was limited to about 72% for CCFLs and about 90% NTSC for enhanced CCFLs with better phosphors known as Wide Color Gamut CCFL (WCG-CCFL). This not only applies to LCD TVs but to LCD monitors and notebook PCs. With cost related to manufacturing and integrating RGB LEDs coming down I think there will be more and more LCD products with extremely good color.

Health effect: As with any product that we use, we need to be reasonable and careful. I don't think I need to say much more than this as most will understand.

Environmental Impact: This is a very important topic especially in light of the enormous impact that electronic goods have on the environment. We throw away millions of mobile phones every year. Where do they all go? They are certainly not all recycled! The less we use to manufacture what we need the better. I think a good step is to eliminate toxic materials in our electronic goods. Most LCDs have CCFL backlights and CCFL technology requires a trace amount of mercury to operate. Mercury is a toxic material and is a big problem. By transitioning to LED we are eliminating mercury and I think that's a good shift. LEDs also require less bulk which means for the same display a manufacture can use less material to house the LCD. You can see that LCDs with LED backlights tend to be thinner and in general consume less energy. This is just a small step and I hope that most electronic goods move toward being more friendly to the environment.

Less Energy: I think that most will agree there have been continued improvements in reducing energy consumption in electronic goods especially large LCD and PDP TVs. Although I don't have an industry wide trend, I do see manufacturers working very hard to reduce power consumption. This reduction is possible by several advancements in optical technology as well as TFT (thin-film transistor)manufacturing. The optical films that allow for the diffusion and recycling of light from a light source is improving so that less light is required to achieve a certain brightness specification. Improvements in BEF (brightness enhancement film) technology and diffusion technology allow for less powerful light sources. Regarding TFT manufacture, transistor sizes are being reduced that increase the aperture ratio and pass more light. Allowing more light through means you get more light without having to use a more power-hungry backlight. These are but just a few examples of developments that allow equal or better front screen performance while using less energy.

Electromagnetic Interference & Radiation: Although I am not an expert in this area my wife is an optometrist and knows first hand that CRT and screens like it (PDP) are not good for your eyes especially if you use it for long durations and are close to it. Even for LCD monitor users it is recommended that you rest your eyes every 1 hour and try to look at things that are farther away.

I do not know what will happen in the future but I am optimistic that companies involved in the display industry will continue to improve the technology, reduce power consumption, be more friendly toward the environment and ultimately serve the customer with good products. I just happen to think that LCD technology will be around for a good long while. :-)

It's simply unacceptable to compare OLED contrast ratio with LCD's "local dimming". The OLED contrast ratio is effective for the single pixel. The local dimming use a very low resolution matrix of LEDs. They only way a LCD can reach a OLED contrast is... to use an high-res OLED panel as backlight. A very brilliant and convenient idea... ;-)
Ehi people are you really kidding ? maybe tech may improve LCD.. but.. the same for OLED tech!! and more ,are many people like me (fool) love to spend money for the last TV .. mobile phone ext ext.. have a nice future
OLED display manufacturers should focus on applications where OLEDs hold distinct value and advantages over LCDs. OLEDs do not perform well in sunlight applications consuming far more power than LCDs to acheive equal contrast ratios. The circular polarizer alone eats up 60% or so of the light. Television seems like a good fit with the fast response time and saturated colors but differential aging and, again, the circular polarizer are huge disadvantages besides the price. And price is what it all comes down to in my mind. LCDs and PDPs last a very long time and do not have burn-in issues any more. OLED displays just cannot compete at that level yet. Therefore, they must work to capture markets where they *can* compete. Low light environments with carefully controlled ambient lighting; especially those in need of small pixel size are perfect. Working the problem from another angle, AMOLEDs, if the cost can be brought well below that of PDP or LCD, could make fine disposable screens for disposable or limited life applications. If not for their oudoor use, OLED displays would be a good fit for cellular telephones. There must be other short-life applications out there. Radically lower cost technologies tend to develop their own applications to support sales and that is what OLEDs need; a killer appplication no LCD or PDP can compete with in price.

do people want big tv's? absolutely yes.
the perfect TV would be about 2 metres high
so that when you see a person on the screen
you are seeing them in REAL size format.
when your in a car its real size,
or walking on a path its real size,
not some little box on a stand in the corner.
We want to 'be there' in the picture.

while it is true that LCD's will continual to improve in the next couple years. the simple fact of the matter is that LCD's need backlights which will make them heavier and larger then OLED's. Backlights will always hurt color accuracy. Backlights will always hurt power efficiency. Backlights add to the complexity of the screen and will make them more costly to produce. The only current disadvantages to OLED's are product life and expense; those problems are fixable, they only exist because the technology is new. LCD's problems are permanent, and while you can reduce them through better technology, you cant get rid of them without the product no longer being a LCD.

not only will OLED's replace LCD's in virtually all applications LCD's are currently used for. OLED's will create new uses for screens that we would of never dreamed of doing before OLED's.